Each month, thousands of people share their views with Healthwatch about health and social care services. This report covers the period from October to December 2019 and provides a snapshot of people’s care based on the experiences of 8,690 people.
This report aims to provide NHS and social care leaders with a summary of:
Key issues the public have told Healthwatch about primary, secondary, mental health and social care support.
The top questions people are seeking advice about.
Healthwatch | February 2020 | What matters to people using A&E
Healthwatch’s latest briefing illustrates the chain of factors which impact on people’s experiences in A&E.
To inform NHS England’s Clinical Review of Standards, Healthwatch have been helping to understand the impact of potential new targets by finding out what matters most to patients and the public when it comes to A&E.
The purpose of our research is not to argue for or against replacing the current four-hour target, but to inform the ongoing debate.
Their research adds to previous work by providing analysis of 330 patient interviews carried out by local Healthwatch in six of the 14 hospitals testing proposed A&E targets. We also look at 6,000 free text comments gathered through the Friends and Family Test, analysed by Healthwatch Suffolk, to contextualise our findings.
The headline message:
Time alone doesn’t dictate how people feel about their experience of A&E. Overall patient experience is also shaped by:
The quality of clinical care they receive
The quality and frequency of the communication
The attitude of staff and whether they have time to offer empathetic care
Whether the A&E is working well with other services, such as NHS 111 and GPs
The quality of the A&E facilities themselves, including things that can make the experience of long waits easier on people, such as access to food and drink (Source: Healthwatch)
NIHR| January 2020 | Online patient feedback is mostly positive — but is not being used effectively
A mixed-methods study funded by the NIHR used five research streams to provide an overview of online patient feedback in the NHS. The NIHR signal of the study underlines some highlights some key areas for improvement for organisations identified in the study to help them make better use of online patient feedback. Importantly, the study suggests that managers could usefully review the infrastructure and processes for responding to feedback if they have not already done so (Source: NIHR).
“Many clinicians may be surprised by the finding that the main motivation for patients who provide online feedback is to support the healthcare service, through either praise or a desire to help the service improve. What is less surprising is that, overall, healthcare providers lack the appropriate infrastructure to make good use of this feedback.
The findings of this study suggest that healthcare organisations could benefit from judicious engagement with online feedback, using it as one tool among many in a cycle of continuous quality improvement. Elizabeth Murray, GP, Professor of eHealth and Primary Care, Co-Director of the eHealth Unit and Head of the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London
Powell, J. et al |2019 | Using online patient feedback to improve NHS services: the INQUIRE multimethod study |Health Services and Delivery Research| Vol. 7 |Issue 38 |doi: 10.3310/signal-000861
Background: Online customer feedback has become routine in many industries, but it has yet to be harnessed for service improvement in health care. Objectives: To identify the current evidence on online patient feedback; to identify public and health professional attitudes and behaviour in relation to online patient feedback; to explore the experiences of patients in providing online feedback to the NHS; and to examine the practices and processes of online patient feedback within NHS trusts.
Design: A multimethod programme of five studies: (1) evidence synthesis and stakeholder consultation; (2) questionnaire survey of the public; (3) qualitative study of patients’ and carers’ experiences of creating and using online comment; (4) questionnaire surveys and a focus group of health-care professionals; and (5) ethnographic organisational case studies with four NHS secondary care provider organisations.
Setting: The UK. Methods: We searched bibliographic databases and conducted hand-searches to January 2018. Synthesis was guided by themes arising from consultation with 15 stakeholders. We conducted a face-to-face survey of a representative sample of the UK population (n = 2036) and 37 purposively sampled qualitative semistructured interviews with people with experience of online feedback. We conducted online surveys of 1001 quota-sampled doctors and 749 nurses or midwives, and a focus group with five allied health professionals. We conducted ethnographic case studies at four NHS trusts, with a researcher spending 6–10 weeks at each site.
Many people (42% of internet users in the general population) read online feedback from other patients. Fewer people (8%) write online feedback, but when they do one of their main reasons is to give praise. Most online feedback is positive in its tone and people describe caring about the NHS and wanting to help it (‘caring for care’). They also want their feedback to elicit a response as part of a conversation. Many professionals, especially doctors, are cautious about online feedback, believing it to be mainly critical and unrepresentative, and rarely encourage it. From a NHS trust perspective, online patient feedback is creating new forms of response-ability (organisations needing the infrastructure to address multiple channels and increasing amounts of online feedback) and responsivity (ensuring responses are swift and publicly visible).
Limitations: This work provides only a cross-sectional snapshot of a fast-emerging phenomenon. Questionnaire surveys can be limited by response bias. The quota sample of doctors and volunteer sample of nurses may not be representative. The ethnographic work was limited in its interrogation of differences between sites. Conclusions: Providing and using online feedback are becoming more common for patients who are often motivated to give praise and to help the NHS improve, but health organisations and professionals are cautious and not fully prepared to use online feedback for service improvement. We identified several disconnections between patient motivations and staff and organisational perspectives, which will need to be resolved if NHS services are to engage with this source of constructive criticism and commentary from patients.
Future work: Intervention studies could measure online feedback as an intervention for service improvement and longitudinal studies could examine use over time, including unanticipated consequences. Content analyses could look for new knowledge on specific tests or treatments. Methodological work is needed to identify the best approaches to analysing feedback.
Improving care by using patient feedback | The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
This themed review features nine new research studies about using patient experience data in the NHS which show what organisations are doing now and what could be done better. The evidence ranges from hospital wards to general practice to mental health settings. There are also insights into new ways of mining and analysing big data, using online feedback and approaches to involving patients in making sense of feedback and driving improvements.
Royal College of General Practice | January 2020 | Long waiting times for GP appointments are unacceptable, says RCGP. College calls on Government to prioritise general practice which has been ‘running on empty for too long’
Responding to a feature that ran in The Sunday Times (in last Sunday’s edition, 5 January 2019), Professor Martin Marshall, Chair of the Royal College of GPs, said: “It is totally unacceptable to expect patients to wait weeks for a GP appointment. Patients -and GPs – deserve better.
“However, the situation in which we find ourselves has not happened overnight, and the College has been sounding the alarm bells for many years.
Over 1m patients are seen in general practice every day, and GPs are doing their best but the service cannot keep stretching. There are limits beyond which GPs can no longer guarantee safe care to patients and the potential for error or misdiagnosis increases.
“There is also the risk that long waiting times for a GP appointment will deter some patients from seeing a GP at all, which could mean they seek help at a much later stage when the problem is much more serious.
“Pressure of workload is taking its toll on the health and wellbeing of GPs themselves. For too many, the job has become untenable, with the result that they are burning out and leaving the profession before their time.
“It is extremely encouraging that we have more GPs in training than ever before, but it takes a long time to qualify and we need urgent action to retain existing GPs and ensure they are supported to remain in the profession and that the job of a frontline GP becomes ‘do-able’ again.” (Source: RCGP)
This quarterly briefing aims to provide health and social care professionals with a summary of the issues raised with Healthwatch
Between July and September over 10,500 people shared their experiences of using health and social care with Healthwatch. This briefing looks at 128 reports published by local Healthwatch and aims to provide health and social care professionals with a summary of the issues people have raised with us.
What issues does the briefing look at?
Emerging themes across primary care, hospital care, social care and mental health. For example, the importance of good communication when GP services are changing and people’s mental health and physical health not being given equal consideration in A&E.
In focus – the support available for people with incontinence and how services can help by making sure patients can easily access the continence products they need.
Spotlight on experiences – the challenges people from diverse ethnic communities can face when using health and care services.